AnswerMentions audits the evidence behind AI recommendations.
AnswerMentions exists for one blunt reason: buyers are already asking AI systems which company to choose. If those systems name your competitors and skip you, the problem is no longer only search ranking. It is answer-level visibility.
What we are
A diagnostic tool and repair service for answer-engine visibility.
The product runs buyer-intent prompts, records which brands are recommended, extracts the cited sources, flags material errors, and turns the pattern into a fix plan. The paid work is not a magic model hack. It is the grounded SEO and content work that makes a company easier to verify: clearer pages, better source coverage, accurate directories, and evidence that can be reused.
We do not publish fake author bios, fake client logos, or anonymous authority theater. Site authorship is the AnswerMentions organization. When public examples are shown, they are labeled as samples or redacted teardowns so the method is visible without pretending to reveal private customer data.
Operating principles
What we will and will not optimize for.
AI visibility work gets silly fast when teams chase prompts instead of evidence. Our default position is conservative: measure the answer, trace the source, fix the fact, then retest.
Recommendations, not vanity mentions
A brand mention that does not help a buyer choose you is weak evidence. We count inclusion, position, recommendation language, cited sources, and factual accuracy.
Evidence before content
Publishing another article is not a strategy until the missing source is known. The audit names the pages, directories, profiles, and claims that influenced the answer.
Repair beats prompt tricks
The durable work is entity cleanup, source repair, comparison content, schema that matches visible facts, and repeat monitoring after recrawl.
Private reports stay private
Customer audit URLs remain authenticated and noindexed. Public examples use redacted samples, method notes, and source types rather than private client data.
Public entity record
The facts answer engines should be able to confirm.
These are the facts we want kept boring and consistent. If a public profile, directory, or comparison page contradicts them, the contradiction should be corrected instead of hidden.
| Canonical domain | answermentions.com |
|---|---|
| Contact | [email protected] |
| Primary users | B2B SaaS, local services, SEO agencies, content teams, Webflow agencies |
| Platforms audited | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI results |
| Core deliverable | Score, competitor share of voice, prompt rows, source map, errors, fix plan |